
A follower sent me this restaurant because the numbers looked almost too good to be true.
And honestly, at first glance, they kind of do.
When we run this through the BizHub calculator with standard SBA terms, the business still produces around $67K a year after debt payments.
For only about a $37K down payment, that looks incredible on paper.
The debt coverage ratio also comes in around 2.27, which is comfortably above lender minimums.
And the cash-on-cash return comes out above 180%.
This restaurant opened in 2023.
That changes everything.
You are not buying a proven restaurant with a long operating history.
You are buying a promising restaurant that has only existed for about two years.
Restaurants fail constantly, especially trendy concepts that look hot early.
And despite the short history, you are still paying a 2.92x cash flow multiple.
Industry average for restaurants is closer to 1.78x.
So you are paying roughly a 64% premium for a restaurant that has not proven long-term durability.
The margins also are not special.
At 16%, they are basically right in line with industry averages.
Nothing about the financial profile alone justifies the premium pricing.
The listing heavily emphasizes that the business is absentee-run.
Most buyers hear that and think passive income.
I hear risk.
Because if this thing is truly printing money with minimal oversight, why is the owner selling instead of scaling the concept?
The seller also offers financing.
On a restaurant this young, that often means traditional financing may not have been straightforward.
I would want to validate:
The BizHub score lands around a 5.58 out of 10.
Good location. Real revenue. Strong early performance.
But you are paying mature-business pricing for a business that has barely proven it can survive long term.
The follower’s gut feeling was right.
Read more at the original source →
